On an episode of Truthwire (above) with Matt Weinglass from The Homeless Left, we dove deep into the beginning of the 12-Day War between the US-Israeli contingent and Iran. On Monday, June 23, 2025 Iran launched their retaliatory attack to the US and Israeli attacks on its nuclear facilities. It’s vital to understand the escalations and changes that led to the US bombing Iran, and then Iran retaliating. Watch above and read below to follow the layout of the presentation.
The Signs Ahead: Before The 12-Day War Began
On June 19 Trump gave a press briefing on Iran, signaling war and speaking in ambiguous terms to ensure manipulation. Ultimately he said Iran should’ve “made the deal” and stated he doesn’t want war but Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon—claiming he believes they'd use it.
There were also leaked documents showing clear cooperation and close coordination between Rafael Grossi, the Secretary General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), & Israel; with the Zionist regime fully implementing their directives against Iran's nuclear program for years.
In response to the anti-Iran resolution passed by the IAEA Board of Governors, Iran launched a new enrichment facility at a secure location and upgraded Fordow’s centrifuges with advanced sixth-generation machines. In a joint statement, Iran’s Foreign Ministry and Atomic Energy Organization condemned the U.S. and three European nations, calling the resolution a politically motivated move lacking legal or technical basis, stressing that Iran has fully cooperated with the Agency and upheld its commitments—yet the policy of engagement has yielded only hostile responses. Iran criticized the West for reviving long-resolved claims—settled by the IAEA in 2015—while ignoring Israel’s weapons program and threats against peaceful nuclear sites. It also accused the U.S., UK, France, and Germany of failing to meet their nuclear disarmament obligations under Article 6 of the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty).
As I stated months ago, in a press conference Putin reiterated Russia’s strategic military partnership with Iran doesn’t include defense. Russia offered to work on air defense systems, but he says Tehran wasn’t keen. There’s more context as Moscow has a strong relationship with both Israel and Iran.
Lebanon-based journalist Marwa Osman wrote one June 19:
“While we were asleep, Iran launched its most powerful and intense strike on occupied Yafa known as Tel Aviv, since the war began. Roughly 30 missiles, a mix of ballistic and hypersonic, were fired, hammering the very heart of Tel Aviv and causing unimaginable damage, far beyond what anyone there could have anticipated, even in their worst nightmares. So… what got hit? Here’s what we know so far:
1. Parts of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange building were destroyed.
2. The home of Danny Naveh, Likud member and former Minister of Environmental Protection, was hit.
3. A direct strike on the Israeli military intelligence headquarters.
4. A direct strike on the Israeli Ministry of Defense building.
But the biggest shock, the one that’s thrown the Israeli entity into chaos, is the strike on Soroka Military Hospital in Be’er Sheva, where soldiers and officers returning from Gaza are treated.
The strike was so powerful that a section of the hospital collapsed, and a leak of hazardous materials inside forced the complete evacuation of the facility.
And here’s the twist: Iran says the hospital itself wasn’t the target. The real objective was the massive IOF C4I Command and Intelligence base located beneath the hospital, as well as the nearby IOF intelligence compound in the Gav-Yam Tech Park adjacent to the hospital. So, once again, Israel is using civilians and hospitals as human shields, exactly the same justification it’s always used for bombing hospitals in Gaza. Only this time… it happened to them.
As expected, Israeli entity media is in full meltdown mode, accusing Iran of targeting civilian infrastructure and hospitals, calling it a war crime, and so on. Within hours of the Iranian strike, over 40 Israeli warplanes were launched in a massive retaliation targeting sites deep inside Tehran.
The most significant target? The Arak nuclear reactor. Built in 1997, the Arak facility was designed for plutonium enrichment, a more advanced alternative to uranium. Though Iran had paused work on it under international pressure, keeping it as a negotiation card, Israel’s strike reportedly destroyed it almost entirely. Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. military is now assisting in the evacuation of non-essential diplomats and their families from its embassy in Zionist Israel.”
One June 21, 2025 she said:
“ SIGNS OF WAR: U.S. Gears Up for a Possible Strike on Iran As the war between Iran and the Zionist Israeli-U.S. axis escalate, multiple military and intelligence indicators suggest the U.S. may be preparing for direct military action against Iran. Here's what we know so far (find links below):
1. Military Buildup
According to WSJ | Reuters: B-2 stealth bombers deployed to Guam & Diego Garcia, ideal platforms for bunker-busting Iranian nuclear sites.
Acoording to AP News: Dual U.S. Carrier Strike Groups now operate in the Red Sea & Gulf of Oman.
2. Logistical Moves
According to the WSJ: Over 40 U.S. aircraft withdrawn from Al Udeid (Qatar), likely repositioned forward.
C-17 and B-52 movement indicates pre-positioning of air power and missile defense assets in the Gulf.
3. Strategic & Intelligence Shifts
According to Bloomberg: Increased satellite tracking & high-altitude recon flights over Iran.
Reports of cyber readiness and command post activations.
4. Diplomatic Posturing
Public threats by U.S. leaders (top of whom is Trump) toward Iran's Leader of the Revolution Imam Sayyed Ali Khamenei, echoing 2020 rhetoric before Martyr Soleimani’s assassination.
Embassy drawdowns & regional evacuations under review.
Conclusion: The confluence of strategic bombers, naval assets, intelligence operations, and political signaling points toward the real possibility of a U.S. strike on Iran, or at the very least, a push to provoke it.”
Operation "Midnight Hammer": U.S. Conducts Precision Strikes on Iranian Nuclear Facilities
On June 21, 2025 Trump struck Iran: “We are carrying out our very successful attack on the three nuclear sites in Iran: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.”
In a meticulously planned nighttime operation, the United States launched a massive aerial assault—codenamed "Midnight Hammer"—targeting Iran’s key nuclear sites at Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. The strikes, involving 125 U.S. military aircraft, were executed between 22:40 and 23:05 GMT on Saturday (02:40-03:05 Sunday Tehran time).
General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, revealed unprecedented details during a Pentagon press briefing. According to Caine:
The mission began with an 18-hour flight from U.S. bases, showcasing America’s long-range strike capabilities—or so they said.
A complex deception strategy was employed: some aircraft veered west into the Pacific as a decoy, while advanced teams secured airspace ahead of the main strike force, but Iran did have knowledge this would happen.
Seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, allegedly somewhat undetected by Iranian defenses, penetrated deep to deliver their payloads.
Simultaneously, two dozen cruise missiles were launched from a U.S. submarine, striking the Isfahan facility. In total, a reported 75 precision-guided munitions rained down on the three sites.
Iran Condemns U.S. Strikes on Nuclear Sites, Vows Retaliation
Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization (AEOI) denounced Saturday’s U.S. attacks on its nuclear facilities, calling them a "brutal assault" violating international law—most of the world’s leadership agreed, including U.S. allies.
The AEOI stressed the sites operate under IAEA supervision and further accused the agency of "indifference—or rather complicity."
"The international community must condemn this lawlessness," the statement read, vowing to defend Iran’s nuclear progress through "all necessary actions."
Reports indicated B-2 stealth bombers were deployed from Missouri, but Iranian sources stated air defenses repelled most strikes, with only minor damage, and the sites had been evacuated, with the enriched uranium relocated beforehand. Not long after, the walk backs on statements began, with even Israel admitting that Trump’s tactless strikes on Iran did far less damage than first claimed. The New York Times, citing Israeli officials, said their initial analysis indicated that the Fordo facility sustained significant damage but was not completely destroyed. An Iranian official warned the U.S. had "joined Israel’s crime" and would face retaliation, dismissing calls for peace as "fear of Iran’s military power," with some officials urging Iran was prepared for war.
Trump then went on to demand peace saying, “There are still many goals, and tonight was the most difficult. If peace is not achieved, we will pursue other goals…Iran is the bully of Middle East.” Yes, Iran is most always deemed the “bully” has the two entities with verified nukes, the U.S. and Israel continue bombing the entire region, with Israel continuing their nearly two-year genocide. One vital thing during this time, Trump did admit the U.S. carefully coordinated with Israel to unleash the attack.
Gaslighting America: Trump’s Broken Promises, Tulsi’s Opportunism, and The Pundits Who Got It All Wrong
Social media exploded with many pointing out Trump and DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s duplicity, posting videos of them speaking against war with Iran—directly contradicting their current stances. In one video Trump says of Joe Biden, "Our president will start a war with Iran, because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective." In another tweet he urged about building broad coalitions with Arabs and Muslims by voting for him and bringing peace, emphasizing that voting for Kamala Harris would bring “WWII”. Others pointed out that this is why Donald Trump’s Zionism or stance on Palestine was not just one issue, as it’s clearly expanding beyond a regional conflict, beyond genocide, into global war. We. Told. You. So. This isn’t his first rodeo, and he did kill Qasem Soleimani.
Tulsi Gabbard had once mentioned how Muammar Gaddafi gave up his nuke program and was still overthrown, saying how North Korea was not going to make that same mistake and these were the consequences of “short-sighted regime change war policies.” But now Tulsi who had also said there was no evidence of Iran having nuclear weapons, changed her tune three months later in a full mask-off moment, saying Iran could produce nuclear weapon “within weeks”. This was of course after Trump told media multiple times that he did not care about his Director of National Intelligence’s assessments saying, "I don’t care what she said. I think they were very close to having one."
Tulsi had always largely disagreed and been critical of Trump, especially regarding his and Bolton’s last actions against Iran during his first term, claiming he lied with his anti-war rhetoric Tulsi Gabbard around 2020: Trump and Neocons want war with Iran. Tulsi March 2025: Iran doesn’t have Nuclear Weapons but Tulsi just three months later in June, agrees with Trump on Iran Nukes. It’s worth noting that Gabbard was part of U.S. intelligence psychological operations and was the Commander of 440th Brigade of Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command.
The Two-Headed Beast Is Still One Beast
Westerners, particularly USIANS, manufacture consent to keep the political game and uniparty alive by saying “but I didn’t vote for war” when they did. Yes the vote does not matter, as politicians are largely selected by a predator ruling class, but there is a rehabilitation of dead-end electoralism that persists as a distraction—getting a population high on the hopium of a savior. Now’s the time to sober up and realize that with Biden you got war and with Trump you got more war. Presidents change but the military intelligence industrial complex continues. The population is running out of time to continue repeating this mistake.
Wake up and don’t delude yourselves. Clinging back onto the other side of the uniparty and swapping red war criminals for blue ones won't save you. The Democrats who greenlit Ukraine's destruction and enabled Gaza's genocide as they protected Israel aren't your saviors—they're the other head of the same imperial beast.
The point isn’t to rehabilitate Kamala or the war criminal democrats you utter numbskulls. The point is to understand this war against Iran has been plotted out before most of us were born and concocted from presidential administration to presidential administration. The point is you live in the Empire that survives by being a death machine thrust upon the planet and until you understand that you need to cut off the head of the machine, it will keep devouring everything in its path— including you.
They are two sides of one warplane. You fund its killing apparatus with every taxed dollar. It survives by consuming nations—Palestine, Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Libya now Iran—and when there’s nothing left to burn, it will turn its hunger on you.
The Attack on Iran Was Planned Long Ago
The attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities was practiced a year ago during joint US-Israeli exercises, ABC News reported per an Israeli source. Israel and the US practiced conducting airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities during the Biden administration, an Israeli source with direct knowledge of the matter confirmed to ABC News on Sunday morning, June 22. The exercises simulated offensive actions against Iranian nuclear facilities for the first time. While the practiced and war-gamed scenario was planned in cooperation with former president Joe Biden's administration, "we did not think a year ago that this would happen now," the source commented.
We can argue though that truly, the desire to destroy Iran has been planned for even longer, as we did it before in 1953 and after the Iranian Revolution led to the overthrow of the Pahlavi dynasty and the establishment of an Islamic Republic, this has been our goal.
For a quick history lesson, in a defining moment of Cold War interventionism, American and British intelligence agencies jointly executed Operation Ajax - a covert coup that violently overthrew Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. The operation, orchestrated by the CIA and British MI6, sought to reverse Mosaddegh's bold nationalization of Iran's oil industry, which had challenged Anglo-American corporate dominance. By reinstating the authoritarian Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Western powers secured their oil interests but crushed Iran's democratic development, planting seeds of anti-Western resentment. This eventually backfired (for us) into the Iranian Revolution.
Russia and China’s West Asian Dilemma: Economic Pragmatism & Diplomatic Limits vs Ideology
Russian President Vladimir Putin told Iran's foreign minister on Monday there was no justification for the U.S. bombing of his country, “The absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran has no basis and no justification," Putin said. The Russian leader hosted Iranian Foreign Minister, Abbas Araqchi, in Moscow two days after U.S. President Donald Trump sent U.S. bomber planes to strike Iran's three main nuclear sites. "Russia is today on the right side of history and international law," Araqchi responded.
A decisive and often fierce speaker, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, eviscerated Washington’s hypocrisy on its accusations regarding Iran’s build up on nuclear weapons, showing that Russia is well aware of who began and escalated the conflict.
US Vice President J.D. Vance: "Russia and China do not want Iran to develop nuclear weapons. He added that nuclear proliferation in the Middle East is a "disaster for everyone."
Zakharova: “First, Russia and China do not want the United States to interfere in their internal affairs in any form. And anyone making statements on behalf of, but not on behalf of, our two countries would do well to start with this. For example, not to supply the Kyiv terrorist regime with deadly missiles, not to militarize Taiwan, etc.
Secondly, Russia and China speak for themselves: the corresponding statements about the aggression of Israel and the United States were published by the Foreign Ministries of both countries.
Thirdly, Russia and China believe that Iran (like any other country) can and should determine its own strategy for the development of nuclear energy in accordance with international law, in particular the NPT, and other states can also base their attitude towards this on an international legal basis.
Fourthly, Iran created peaceful nuclear energy, which it has every right to do, and did not create nuclear weapons, which has been repeatedly confirmed by both Tehran itself and the IAEA.
Fifth, a little history. Perhaps the very first time the idea of a nuclear-weapon-free Middle East was voiced was in a statement by the Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union, then the official voice of Moscow, on January 22, 1958: ‘The Near and Middle East should and can become a zone of peace where there are not and should not be nuclear and missile weapons, a zone of good neighborliness and friendly cooperation between states.’ In 1974, the same Iran that is now under attack from Israel and the United States initiated a discussion of this topic at the UN General Assembly, which ended with the adoption of a resolution on the "Establishment of a Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in the Middle East." 128 countries voted "for," including the Soviet Union and the United States. Israel abstained from voting. The USSR/Russia systematically advocated the creation of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the Middle East.
Today, the only state in the region that possesses nuclear weapons is Israel, which systematically ignores initiatives to create a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons, and now, together with the United States, is bombing Iran, which does not possess nuclear weapons.”
More recently Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Russia wants Iran to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), demanding respect for Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, “We are interested in Iran's cooperation with the IAEA continuing, stating, “We are interested in everyone respecting the Supreme Leader of Iran, who has repeatedly stated that Iran does not and will not have plans to create nuclear weapons.”
Meanwhile Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasized at the Eurasian Economic Forum that the Israeli-Iranian conflict is now “a thing of the past” and the door for the EAEU to foster relations with all Middle Eastern nations was open.
"In May, a free trade agreement with Iran came into force…Thankfully, the situation in the Middle East is stabilizing. The longstanding conflict between Israel and Iran is, thanks to God's grace, now behind us." He concluded by stating, "This development paves the way for us to cultivate closer ties with all countries across the region.”
Beijing’s been similarly diplomatic reaching out to both sides to express its desire for a mediated solution even as the country’s top diplomat, Foreign Minister Wang Yi, condemned Israel’s actions as a violation of international law. But when Iran threatened to blockade the strategically important Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 percent of the world’s oil passes, Beijing was also quick to speak out against this, calling for the “international community to step up efforts to de-escalate conflicts and prevent regional turmoil from having a greater impact on global economic development”. Like Russia, they are operating in a pragmatic sense rather than in an ideologically-driven one.
China performs a delicate balancing act in West Asia, where its economic interests stretch wide across competing powers. The country maintains investments in Zionist Israel's booming tech sector while simultaneously advancing its Belt and Road Initiative through Iran, Saudi Arabia, and five other Gulf states, States which also often aid Israel but provide lite opposition to their genocide in Gaza and multiple illegal attacks on Iran and other players in the region. This strategic positioning becomes particularly vital given China's heavy energy dependence on the region - it imports more than half its crude oil from Middle Eastern suppliers and stands as Iran's largest oil customer. Any prolonged conflict or Iranian blockade of the critical Strait of Hormuz (a threat actually voiced by Tehran's parliament but not yet acted on) would severely disrupt China's energy lifeline, jeopardizing both its economic security and regional ambitions.
In 2021, China and Iran signed a 25-year “strategic partnership”, and Iran has also joined the Beijing-led Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, taking part in China’s “Maritime Security Belt” naval exercises this year. There’s also China-Iran corridor, which is now operational as of June and will cut the transit time from 40 to 15 days, boosting trade efficiency and possibly bypassing U.S. sanctions. While ideologically motivated actors may find China's stance frustrating, the cold reality is that war and security instability not only threatens Chinese investments and trade, but jeopardizes global oil prices and energy security in general. Thus Beijing’s preferred position prioritizes stability and categorically rejects military solutions to conflicts— regardless of the parties involved.
This shouldn’t surprise those paying attention as China, like Russia, has played peacemaker in the Middle East, notching significant diplomatic victories. In 2023, Beijing brokered the historic détente between archnemeses Iran and Saudi Arabia . In July of 2024, they also facilitated another landmark agreement between Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah. Still Russia and China both understand that if Iran were ever to fall, they would not only be impacted economically, but also geopolitically as Iran signifies a strong ally and they would then be on the regime change radar—to put it bluntly—up next on the chopping block.
Iran Strikes US Bases in Qatar: “Barakat al-Fatah" Begins & Ends
On June 23, 2025, the Qatari Foreign Ministry announces the suspension of air traffic. Qatar Airways flight QR330 from London turned around, followed by all other planes in the area. This came as Israel had escalated attacks in Southern Lebanon and sources in Qatar, Israel and even the U.S., were warning of an imminent Iranian attack on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. Then there were reports of explosions in Doha—Iran’s retaliatory attack had begun.
Donald Trump wasted no time on Truth Social , going on social media to announce that Iran had responded weakly, “hardly any damage” was done. He also thanked Iran for giving Washington the “head’s up,” while immediately asking for “peace” from Tehran and Israel. But as Iran’s attacks continued so did Trump’s incessant, chaotic, posting, where he alleged Iran had not only asked for peace but also for a “ceasefire”.
But as Trump tweeted and posted about peace and congratulated himself for achieving a ceasefire, Israelis were being pummeled in Tel-Aviv and Be’er Sheva, launching 6 waves of ballistic missiles at Israel, just as a supposed ceasefire was about to begin. This ushered in a massive amount of confusion because while Trump, Netanyahu and some Arab and all of Western media claimed the ceasefire was truly happening, members of the IRGC, most Iranian media, and ground sources, including the Iranin Foreign Minister and earlier on Imam Khamenei were saying otherwise—though the FM appeared to suggest a cessation of the war if Israel stopped its attacks.
Ultimately Israel did stop but accused Iran ( who technically never did agree to a ceasefire) of breaking the ceasefire and firing fresh missiles at Tel-Aviv, while Tehran claimed that there were three strikes sent toward Iran earlier in the morning after the ceasefire had taken place. Trump responded furiously at this, saying he was angry at both but “especially Israel” for not sticking to peace, “They don’t know what the f-ck they’re doing,” he said.
Finally the Iranian Foreign Minister came out and said that Iran did not accept a ceasefire but announced a halt in operations. In an interview for Iranian media, he stated that the approved policy was that if the enemy stops its attacks without preconditions, Iran would also end its retaliations. On his way back to Tehran, he received a message from the other side indicating a halt in attacks from 4AM Tehran time. Eventually, it was announced to the other side that Iran does not accept a ceasefire, “but if the Zionist regime stops its attacks, Iran will not continue its operations.”
It’s Not Over: False Flags and Promise of War Continue With A More United Iran
In attempts to stir drama and make storm in a teacup, U.S. President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that China may continue purchasing Iranian oil—just weeks after threatening harsh penalties for this very transaction— hours after Israel halted its aggression against Iran. The move contrasts with Trump's February 4 "maximum pressure" memorandum and subsequent sanctions targeting Chinese firms importing Iranian crude—despite Beijing's longstanding rejection of unilateral U.S. sanctions.
The walk-backs from even mainstream Western and Israeli media have now increased, admitting that perhaps Trump’s strikes on Tehran barely made a dent on deterring its nuclear program.
A classified Defense Intelligence Agency report, compiled with U.S. Central Command, reveals preliminary but evolving findings about the unprecedented B-2 stealth bomber strike - the largest in U.S. history - that targeted Iran's nuclear facilities with massive bunker-buster bombs. While military officials confirm the sites sustained significant damage, they caution that a comprehensive "battle damage assessment" remains ongoing and could take weeks to finalize. Early analysis indicates the strikes successfully sealed entrances to two nuclear sites, but caused predominantly surface-level destruction, leaving underground structures operational. Most critically, the report confirms what Tehran had said all along, that Iranian forces had relocated at least some enriched uranium prior to the attack, and that centrifuge arrays remain largely undamaged. The White house responded saying these were attempts to undermine President Trump’s success.
Fox News and right-wing, anti-Iranian media has been busy with the long posed “Iranian sleeper cell” allegations, which have permeated U.S. media for months and which were also fear-mongering those concerned with the border, alleging that terrorists could come through there. More recently there’s been reports of a “foiled Israeli false-flag operation” sought to trigger a U.S.-Iran war.
A reported exclusive investigation by the Tehran Times uncovered an alleged Israeli plot to stage a false-flag attack on U.S. soil and pin the blame on Iran, with the apparent goal of provoking a full-scale war between Washington and Tehran. According to the report, the operation involved plans to detonate explosives in America while fabricating evidence to implicate Iran, thereby manipulating U.S. public opinion into manufacturing consent for military retaliation. The scheme was allegedly foiled when a friendly nation shared critical information with Iranian officials, who then alerted U.S. authorities and prevented the attack from being carried out.
While only the Tehran Times backs this very short and rather muddy allegation, it also is hard to believe that Washington’s intel apparatus would not already know of such an attack—especially since the story of Iranian sleeper cells came from the U.S. and echo Cold-War era “Russian sleeper agent” fear-mongering.
The story however, is backed corroboration from two additional sources, including the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense. Established in 2014 as a private sector initiative, this influential body brings together Democrats and Republicans (hence the name) to assess U.S. biodefense efforts and provide recommendations for preparedness across critical areas: threat awareness, detection systems, defensive measures, surveillance networks, and emergency response protocols. Its alleged goal is to strengthen the nation's ability to prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from biological threats, whether naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate. Based on its assessments, the Commission develops “recommendations” to enhance national biodefense capabilities, including policy and legislative changes. Its recent baby is the April 2024 report on the National Blueprint For Biodefense, on “immediate action needed to defend against biological threats.” One posed “scenario” describes a biological agent targeting humans and animals, the emergence of disease, the needs to address the agent, its impacts, and the consequences of failure. Here is an excerpt from the report:
Nine weeks ago, some nation or terrorist group—we still do not know who—attacked the Nation’s Capital and other US cities with biological weapons as we celebrated Independence Day. The infectious agent they used killed at least 280,000 Americans and infected at least 400,000 throughout the country in a single day, in addition to the 200,000 dead and 800,000 sickened animals. These numbers will increase as the disease spreads. Many of our own colleagues and staff here in Congress fell ill and died. Coordinated attacks in allied nations in the days that followed killed tens of thousands more. We are now hearing that the terrorists conducted smaller scale attacks in American cities and localities prior to the July 4 incidents to test our defenses and gauge our responses. These smaller-scale attacks went largely unnoticed. Laboratory tests confirm that Nipah virus caused the disease, but we still do not know what methods our adversaries used to infect humans and spread the disease among livestock in rural communities. Animals and people were sick for more than a month before we realized what had happened. While the virus is in the same family as other common human and animal viruses, most American veterinarians and physicians had never seen Nipah virus before, which delayed recognition. The virus, which in nature does not spread easily among people, was genetically modified to increase its ability to spread from animalto-animal, animal-to-person, and person-to-person, while still retaining a mortality rate of 40%. Despite these assessments, our adversaries conducted the deadly biological attacks of July 4 here and throughout the world.
The fourth of July seems to be a popular day for a false flag, as the group Anonymous, of course to be viewed with skepticism whether or not it actually is them, also alleged of a False Flag Plot to get us into war, led by our “greatest ally”. They claim we will have more information right before July 4th. While the date now appears too obvious, America’s birthday, it is true that most U.S. Americans do not want war with Iran and only something as big as an attack on U.S. soil might convince them otherwise.
What comes next is hard to say but what is true is that this war is anything but over. The United States as stated by many of Washington’s leading politician’s and operatives, is not just out to destroy Iran’s nukes, but Iran itself. Whether it does this from within or outside, its motto is regime change first and then comes the rest. What we have now is time and planning. Israel and Washington have likely already plotted their next moves, assessing that Iran is a more than capable adversary, which was a clear objective of U.S. operations against Tehran anyway— a test of sorts— which Iran not only passed but far exceeded expectations.
Iran will now also have to assess and continue thwarting out Mossad operatives, an admitted vulnerability that it must continue addressing. But Tehran has also delivered a strong psychological defeat of Western propaganda against it, creating a positive reaction from its well-deserved pummeling of Israel, the villainous, genocidal entity and bully who finally got clobbered. More vitally, Iran also united its own people who were previously more divided but who witnessed that Iran did not start this war and that sovereign countries ought to be respected. Israel’s aggression thus showed Iranians that Iran could indeed defend them—defeating decades of Western propaganda hand in glove.
.
Share this post