As BRICS expands its global influence, through summits, cooperation efforts, and new members, its continued trade with Israel, Saudi Arabia as its member, and other actions like mirroring the U.N. charter, raise a disturbing question we should all be asking: is multipolarity truly a real challenge to Western hegemony, or is it merely a rebranding of the same oppressive global system—a system that’s kept exploiting or ignoring those labeled weak and excusing the actions of the more powerful? In essence, a world where the ends justify the means.
Vanessa and I attempt to answer this question, plus touch on the very exaggerated slaying of Charlie Kirk, an event that’s sparked massive debate and shown itself to be manipulating people into vast division, in order to impose more draconian surveillance methods.
We begin analyzing the assassination of a controversial, ultra-Zionist figure, “white-Nationalist,” founder of controversial Turning Point USA. Although the mainstream narrative is giving us a very slanted view, and the right blames the “radical left,” we don’t know exactly who was behind the assassination. I do not go deep into it here but some have claimed Israel is behind this, which I actually do not see evidence of other than anecdotal. I will say more on this in a separate post.
Charlie Kirk was extremely hated by a segment of the U.S. population because he did get rich from hate, especially toward U.S. minorities, immigrants, and the left-leaning side. However as we discuss, the timing of the shooting, the way it was done as a sniper from a roof mimicking Trump’s, suggest this event could be coordinated from inside U.S. intelligence or a group, as such would be manipulated to stoke fire among divided factions. But we bring this up not because it is a significant event in itself, as people get shot every day, and ironically Charlie was very much against any gun control. But this event is flashed across al media, weaponized to stoke domestic left-right civil conflict in the U.S. and used to justify a further slide into authoritarianism, including enhanced surveillance and crackdowns on dissent. It is also a huge distraction from more critical issues at home, from war abroad and genocide in Gaza, taking the focus away from the real enemy; a perfect tactic to divide the public while the government expands its control.
We then move to the main subject of this podcast episode, the failure of BRICS nations (particularly Russia, China, and India) to take meaningful action against Israel, which is not only continuing it’s almost 2-year genocide of Gaza but is now encroaching on the occupied Palestinian territories in the West Bank. Despite positioning themselves as an alternative to Western hegemony and representing a larger portion of the global economy and population, these countries continue and have even increased their economic and arms trade with Israel.
While we do know very well that Israel and the United States as well as NATO nations are the ones mostly empowering Israel, especially Washington with billions, this is not going to change unless there is a radical change in the foundation of the captured U.S. government, which would take years. Plus as we’ve seen, the U.S. population is currently Zionist captured, propagandized, easily manipulated, and with nowhere near the required awareness or organization to change anything that drastically for decades. We do not expect the U.S., U.K. or Europe, a conglomerate of basic vassal states to America, to do much at all as they are fully imbedded with Zionist control and their lack of moral clarity on this is obvious—they’re a lost cause until their own people rise up.
But these powerful states, which condemn Western violations of international law, are turning a blind eye to what is the greatest transgression against humanity in modern history—the holocaust of our time, thereby failing their moral responsibility TO BE DIFFERENT and do in ACTION, the things they say they are doing, to be what their mantras say they stand for. The point is these nations can easily stop economic trade and engagement with the Zionist entity and they have not, but they should and it is not wrong or unfair for us to demand it from them because they are supposed to be better than the U.S. and its allies—so they say.
We do challenge the notion that BRICS offers a new, equitable multipolar world order, because right now it is merely replicating a more diverse form of power where the weak remain weak and exploited, perhaps with soft-power and more cooperation. There seems to be no ideologically-driven opposition to hegemony but rather a desire to attain a larger share of global power and economic influence within the same capitalist framework. It would appear based on economic evidence, numbers and data that Russia and China are engaging in the same realpolitik that sacrifices vulnerable populations, such as in Syria and Yemen, for pragmatic and economic gains—making them fundamentally similar to the Western powers they claim to oppose.
The idea of Zionism as limited to Netanyahu or even Israel, is not correct but it is rather now a global contagion, a severely influential ideology that has deeply infiltrated Western governments and societies, creating a Zionist shadow state in countries like the U.S. and U.K. Through extensive economic partnerships and lobbying power, this influence is a growing global phenomenon that could even permeate BRICS nations if not quarantined—it arguably already has to some degree. This issue is a giant elephant in the room—widely sensed by people grappling with economic hardship, but rarely discussed outright by governments and mainstream media.
We do end with touching on U.S. aggression towards Venezuela, predicting that any regime change efforts will likely be through internal destabilization or proxies, or urging its neighbors like Colombia, rather than direct military invasion. Washington has continued their attacks as of recent with President Donald Trump claiming the U.S. military destroyed yet another Venezuelan drug vessel traveling in international waters on the way to the US this Monday. Trump said the three men were killed in the attack on "violent drug trafficking cartels,” but provided no evidence that the boat was carrying drugs. Earlier Nicolás Maduro said Caracas would defend itself against US aggression, and called Secretary of State Marco Rubio the "lord of death and war".
We also highlight that it’s a huge red flag that Venezuela was basically blocked from entering BRICS and this was not just on Brazil, which became a scapegoat. Ultimately, holding alternative powers accountable is not about blaming them, but about demanding they live up to their professed principles because we believe there IS hope they can live up to them. Ending the genocide in Palestine is the paramount moral issue of our time, and if a new world order is to be genuinely different, it must start by taking a definitive stand there—otherwise what comes next may be much worse.
